Close

PARTNER HOTLINES

%%CLICK_URL_UNESC%%

CRM Mission: Going on a Leads Diet

By David Taber on Apr 16, 2012
David Taber About the author

David Taber

David Taber is the author of the book, “Salesforce.com Secrets of Success” and the CEO of SalesLogistix, a certified Salesforce.com consultancy focused on business process improvement through use of CRM systems.

There’s no question that every company needs a solid pipeline of business — that’s what gives you predictability, profitability, and consistency. The question is, “how do you get more pipeline?” And if you want profitability, businesses should be focused on the cost of customer acquisition.
The problem is, leads are pretty far way away from pipeline. To ask questions about the cost of leads is focusing on the wrong thing: it doesn’t matter what your answers are, they’re wrong.

Why?

While it’s easy to state the cost of leads, the value of any specific lead is indeterminate. Ask the sales guys, and they’ll say that the leads they have are worthless. In many (maybe even most) organizations, 50 percent of the leads are not followed up on soon enough to make a difference… if at all. But if you assign a lead to somebody else, the losing rep will scream bloody murder that he can no longer make quota because of losing that one lead.
This isn’t a snarky joke. This is a classic problem that’s dealt with in behavioral economics and game theory.

When you have an item that has a low probability of having a very large value, it’s not rational to run a weighted average. Think about lottery tickets: you have a 1-in-49 million chance of winning $75 million. The value of your ticket is $1.50, but only in the abstract. As a practical matter, your ticket is worth $0.
Of course, the probability of a lead converting is way better than a lottery ticket. But measuring raw leads just doesn’t… err… lead to good decisions.
Get Semantics Under Control

The main problem with discussing the value and quality of leads is that the conversation is based on a blurred and confused definition of the word “leads.” Sales reps often confuse a lead with an opportunity, implying that leads are very valuable. Your CRM system doesn’t work that way.

So let’s start by clearing that up (these semantics are for the enterprise sales model — your firm’s sales model will drive somewhat different semantics):

  • Names are at the bottom of the food chain as they aren’t really leads at all. They are simply people whose names and contact information we’ve obtained. While they may have indicated “I want to know more,” they have given us nothing about their intention of doing business with us. The goal is to keep these “not yet leads” away from the sales force, and to use marketing automation to nurture these leads at near zero cost.
  • Once a name has started to take actions that indicate some serious interest, they are promoted to leads. These leads are sometimes called Marketing QualifiedLeads (MQL). In my opinion, it is not worth the effort to measure these closely because the MQL statistics are inherently too noisy. In some markets, the probability of an MQL becoming a new customer is well below 2 percent.
  • Once a lead has been interviewed by the telesales organization, it can be qualified and converted to a contact. These Sales Qualified Leads are worth measuring for quality, quantity, and cost, even though the final probability of becoming a new customer can often be below 10 percent.
  • After conversion, the sales organization begins to apply more effort to developing the contact, and at some point, an opportunity will be created. A new opportunity is the definitive signal that a sales cycle has begun, and it needs to be carefully measured. Even though the win rate of open sales cycles ought to be better than 25 percent, detailed analysis of your pipeline may show that a large portion of those opportunities that do close are not profitable. This is OK only if your organization knows this and is pursuing these deals with strategic objectives in mind. That said, one of the staples of management consulting is the discovery and weeding out of unprofitable customers.

If there is one thing to optimize in the whole sales cycle, it’s the number and quality of sales cycles started (as measured by number and value of opportunities opened). You don’t really care how many leads it takes to create that much pipeline, so don’t focus on simple lead metrics. Instead, focus on optimizing what leads convert to pipeline.

Latest Opinions

  • In Public Cloud Computing Fight, the Gloves Come Off

    Price cuts from Amazon, Google and Microsoft support predictions that the public cloud computing market is a race to the bottom -- for pricing, that is. Customers will no doubt benefit, but cloud providers who aren't one of those three companies should be prepared for a long, hard war of attrition.

    Bernard Golden
  • Vijay Ramachandran

    From the Editor: Crocodile Chronicle

    Fact is that growth is directly related to the size of the field you are playing in; to resource pipeline that you can tap into.

    Vijay Ramachandran
  • Microsoft Gets Strategic with Its Enterprise Mobility Suite

    With its Enterprise Mobility Suite, Microsoft will make it easier for companies to manage a range of devices, including those running Apple's iOS and Google's Android. It's a smart move, says columnist Ryan Faas.

    Ryan Faas
  • Mike Elgan

    Four Reasons Microsoft is a New Company Under Nadella

    While it's true that many of the changes announced under the leadership of CEO Satya Nadella were initiated under his predecessor, Steve Ballmer, it's still clear that this isn't the same old company

    Mike Elgan
  • Yogesh Gupta

    Seven GOs, One Fiscal

    The technology and the associated demand landscape changes so often that it becomes problematic to project revenue numbers or profit margins twelve months in advance.

    Yogesh Gupta